To an unprecedented degree, Democrat-appointed federal judges are making war on the Trump administration, and on the majority of Americans. They are doing this by 1) being selected by Democratic Party lawyers on the basis of political affinity, 2) making findings that are hostile to the Trump administration, but often plainly wrong, supported by little or no record, and 3) on the basis of those findings, issuing orders that purport to have universal–nationwide–scope, thus effectively vetoing a policy of the Executive Branch. Many have wondered: Can this possibly be legal?
This is not a new question. Sitting Supreme Court justices have questioned the legality, and wisdom, of nationwide injunctions. Here, the great Senator John Kennedy questions a friendly Department of Justice witness (I think) on that topic:
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2025
Our country is undergoing a constitutional crisis. That crisis was not triggered by the Trump administration, which is fulfilling the campaign promises on which it was elected in, so far as I have seen, an entirely legal way, but rather by Democratic Party district court judges who disagree with the Trump administration politically, and are doing everything they can to overturn or negate the last presidential election.
What these robed rebels are doing is vastly closer to an insurrection than anything that was done by the ragtag protesters of January 6, 2021. Chief Justice John Roberts is famously concerned with the political legitimacy of the Judicial Branch. That legitimacy is in danger, right now, as a result of the Democratic Party’s fanatically loyal judges abusing their power. If it wants to preserve any shred of legitimacy, the Supreme Court must act.
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1&appId=154257474630565”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
Source link
